Faculty Profile

Neil Diamant

Professor of Asian Law and Society; Walter E. Beach '56 Chair in Political Science (2002)

Contact Information

diamantn@dickinson.edu

Stern Center for Global Educ Room 005
717-245-1540

Bio

Professor Diamant's research focuses on law and society in Asia (with particular reference to China, Japan, and India), civil-military relations in China, patriotism in comparative perspective, and Chinese constitutionalism. He also teaches courses on Israeli politics and Zionism. Publications: Professor Diamant is the author or co-author of four books: Useful Bullshit: Constitutions in Chinese Politics and Society (Cornell University Press, 2021); (with Martin Crotty and Mark Edele) The Politics of Veteran Benefits in the Twentieth Century: A Comparative History (Cornell University Press, 2020); Embattled Glory: Veterans, Military Families and the Politics of Patriotism in China, 1949-2007 (Rowman & Littlefield, 2009), and Revolutionizing the Family: Politics, Love, and Divorce in Urban and Rural China, 1949-1968 (University of California Press, 2000). He also co-edited Engaging the Law in China: State, Society and Possibilities for Justice (Stanford University Press, 2005). Recent articles include "Conspicuous Silence: Veterans and the Depoliticization of War Memory in China" (Modern Asian Studies, 2011), "Veterans, Organization, and the Politics of Martial Citizenship in China" (Journal of East Asian Studies, 2007), and, with Kevin J. O’Brien, "Veterans' Political Activism in China" (Modern China, 2014) and "Contentious Veterans: China's Ex-Officers Speak Out" (Armed Forces and Society, 2014). His articles on China's 1954 Constitution were published in The China Journal (2015) and Cold War Studies (2018). He has also contributed chapters to a number of edited volumes, including "The Limitations of Martial Citizenship in the People's Republic of China," in Peled, Lewin-Epstein, Mundlak and Cohen's Democratic Citizenship and War (2010); "Why Archives?" in Carlson, Gallagher, Lieberthal, and Manion's Chinese Politics: New Sources, Methods, and Field Strategies (2010); and "Legal Syncretism and Family Change in Urban and Rural China" in Galvan and Sil's, Reconfiguring Institutions across Time and Space: Syncretic Responses to Challenges of Political and Economic Transformation (2007).

Education

  • B.A., Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1988
  • M.A., University of Washington, 1991
  • Ph.D., University of California at Berkeley, 1996

2025-2026 Academic Year

Fall 2025

FYSM 100 First-Year Seminar
The First-Year Seminar (FYS) introduces students to Dickinson as a "community of inquiry" by developing habits of mind essential to liberal learning. Through the study of a compelling issue or broad topic chosen by their faculty member, students will: - Critically analyze information and ideas - Examine issues from multiple perspectives - Discuss, debate and defend ideas, including one's own views, with clarity and reason - Develop discernment, facility and ethical responsibility in using information, and - Create clear academic writing The small group seminar format of this course promotes discussion and interaction among students and their professor. In addition, the professor serves as students' initial academic advisor. This course does not duplicate in content any other course in the curriculum and may not be used to fulfill any other graduation requirement.

POSC 290 Authoritarianism
At the end of the Cold War in 1991, it was not uncommon to hear, in one version or another, that liberal democracy and free market capitalism not only emerged victorious in the realm of competing political ideas, but also that the political world in the near and distant future would be full of states adopting these ideas. At that time, countries such as China, Iran, Iraq, Vietnam, Cuba, Laos, and North Korea were considered outliers, that, like dinosaurs, would soon be extinct. Much has changed since then. Around the world liberal democracy is in decline, while authoritarianism, in one form or another, is both resilient where it currently exists and on the rise in places such as Hungary and the United States. More than this, authoritarian leaders insist that their political model is superior in achieving goals the public considers important, such as economic growth and the provision of public order. This course offers students a comprehensive survey of authoritarianism as a political theory and practice, in comparative perspective. Looking at cases such as China, South Korea, the USSR/Russia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Singapore and the United States, we will examine why certain people are inclined to support authoritarian regimes, their fundamental features, how they gain and maintain support, how they work in practice, and how they collapse, among other topics. Under what circumstances can authoritarian regimes succeed in providing security, economic growth and more equality. Why are some authoritarian regimes durable whereas others are unstable and weak? Why do some collapse, and how do their legacies influence the kinds of political regimes that emerge in the aftermath?

INST 390 Constitutions in Comp Contexts
Cross-listed with LAWP 400-01 and POSC 390-02. Blending law, comparative politics, religion, and history, this seminar looks at the wide variety of functions that constitutions fulfill in politics, economics, and society in democratic and nondemocratic countries. In the United States, we are accustomed to the idea that the Constitution structures political behavior by setting rules for, and limiting, executive and legislative authority. Through its Amendments, it also has provided a basis for the expansion of citizen rights. Looking at constitutions in comparative context, however, reveals a more complex story. In this class we will see that constitutions play many other roles: restructuring an economy; building, altering, and subverting democracy; legitimizing authoritarianism and providing a basis for rights litigation; teaching people about their rights and their obligations; and, through "constitutional participation," gathering intelligence on citizens' political views. We will also examine how Islamic, Buddhist, and civil law constitutional traditions do not accord constitutions the same power over politics and society that we do. Polities covered in this course include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Czechia, Ecuador, the European Union, India, Iran, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, the United States, and Venezuela.

POSC 390 Constitutions in Comp Contexts
Cross-listed with INST 390-01 and LAWP 400-01. Blending law, comparative politics, religion, and history, this seminar looks at the wide variety of functions that constitutions fulfill in politics, economics, and society in democratic and nondemocratic countries. In the United States, we are accustomed to the idea that the Constitution structures political behavior by setting rules for, and limiting, executive and legislative authority. Through its Amendments, it also has provided a basis for the expansion of citizen rights. Looking at constitutions in comparative context, however, reveals a more complex story. In this class we will see that constitutions play many other roles: restructuring an economy; building, altering, and subverting democracy; legitimizing authoritarianism and providing a basis for rights litigation; teaching people about their rights and their obligations; and, through "constitutional participation," gathering intelligence on citizens' political views. We will also examine how Islamic, Buddhist, and civil law constitutional traditions do not accord constitutions the same power over politics and society that we do. Polities covered in this course include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Czechia, Ecuador, the European Union, India, Iran, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, the United States, and Venezuela.

LAWP 400 Constitutions in Comp Contexts
Cross-listed with INST 390-01 and POSC 390-02. Blending law, comparative politics, religion, and history, this seminar looks at the wide variety of functions that constitutions fulfill in politics, economics, and society in democratic and nondemocratic countries. In the United States, we are accustomed to the idea that the Constitution structures political behavior by setting rules for, and limiting, executive and legislative authority. Through its Amendments, it also has provided a basis for the expansion of citizen rights. Looking at constitutions in comparative context, however, reveals a more complex story. In this class we will see that constitutions play many other roles: restructuring an economy; building, altering, and subverting democracy; legitimizing authoritarianism and providing a basis for rights litigation; teaching people about their rights and their obligations; and, through "constitutional participation," gathering intelligence on citizens' political views. We will also examine how Islamic, Buddhist, and civil law constitutional traditions do not accord constitutions the same power over politics and society that we do. Polities covered in this course include Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, China, Czechia, Ecuador, the European Union, India, Iran, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, the United States, and Venezuela.