|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Be sure to indicate your objective(s), central
question(s), and thesis early in the paper. Be sure you have
accomplished the objectives, answered the questions, and proven the
thesis by the end
of the paper.
2. Be sure to support generalizations with evidence and logic. [i.e. Do not give me cause to write "how do you know this?" or "how did you reach this conclusion?" on your paper]. 3. Be sure that the information, facts, data that you include are there for a purpose. An approach that simply throws information at the reader with no clear objective apparent should be avoided. [i.e. Do not give me cause to write, "interesting facts, but so what?" or "how is this info important to proving your thesis?" on your paper]. 4. Related to points 1-3 above, the best papers will have a sense of purpose and direction that remains clear throughout the paper. What you say on page 2 should somehow be relevant to and help to set up what you will say on page 10. |
|
|
| 1. Avoid the use of direct quotes unless absolutely
necessary. Situations where such use is necessary might include
those where the author's views and words are themselves the focus of
analysis or where the particular style or phrasing of the author cited
needs to be captured. On the other hand, you normally do not need a
direct quote simply to convey information.
2. Long quotes (3+ lines) should be indented and single-spaced. 3. Short quotes (even if only a few words) should always be put in quotation marks. 4. Citation of sources is required. Generally speaking you must provide a citation for:
5. You have two general options for citing sources:
6. When citing internet sources be sure to include: the author of the document, the document title, the publisher and/or name of the web site, date of publication (if available), the URL (web address), and the date you accessed the site. For details on citing electronic sources of all kinds see the links at the end of this page. 7. Bibliographies (for papers in my classes) are optional unless otherwise indicated. The primary purpose of a bibliography is to provide a service to readers who want to read further on a subject. No one will be fooled by a paper with 2 footnotes and a 3 page bibliography. |
|
|
| 1. Consider the use of subheadings to help organize your
paper. Subheadings are especially useful in longer papers (10 pages
or more) and can sometimes be useful in shorter papers as well. Be
careful not to overdo it in this regard however.
2. Do not litter your paper with redundant introductions to each paragraph (e.g. statements such as "I will now discuss ..." should be used sparingly). At times such introductions are appropriate, but exercise judgment in deciding when to use them and how to phrase them. 3. Generally avoid use of the second person. Third person is preferable. First person should be used sparingly. 4. Avoid slang. ("Go figure." is currently at the top of my list of the slang phrases that I hate to read in student papers.) 5. Watch your spelling. In the age of word
processing and spell-checkers, there is no excuse for a paper full of
spelling
errors.
|
|
|
| 1. Number your pages.
2. Page length is assumed to be approximately 250 words. Avoid extra-large fonts or extra-wide margins. On the other hand, extra-small fonts and extra-skimpy margins should also be avoided. Use of 12 pt. font with a one-inch margin on all sides is the standard. 3. You should adhere to the stated expectations regarding
the length of the paper. While there is obviously going to be some
room for variation, a five page paper is generally not going to be able
to meet the substantive expectations of a 10 page assignment. On the
other hand, there is no reward to be expected (and there could even be
a penalty) for turning a 10 page assignment into a 20 page paper. Keep
in mind that the same topic can often be addressed successfully in a
400 page book and in a 400 word op-ed piece. The page recommendations
are
there to serve as a guide to what kind of a product you produce.
|
|
|
| 1. My evaluation of your paper is, generally speaking,
going to be based on three things:
a) The
quality
of the insight and understanding that is demonstrated in the paper--
b) Your
research effort as reflected in the quantity, quality, and variety of
sources utilized--
c) Your
ability to present your analysis in a well-written and well-organized
fashion--
A-- "exceptionally high level of achievement"-- grades in this range are reserved for work which is clearly outstanding with respect to understanding and insight, research effort, and writing/organization. B-- "substantial level of achievement" -- grades in this range are a reward for work well done. Work at this level will, generally speaking, not have any glaring problems but will lack some of the distinctiveness and special effort that characterizes work at the "A" level. C-- "satisfactory level of achievement"--grades in this range are given for generally competent work which reflects a reasonable effort to complete the assignment. There may be many good things about work at this level-- keep in mind that if you think of a "C" grade as a grade in the 70s, it is closer to "perfection" [100] than it is to its opposite [0]. But there will also be some problem or problems apparent with respect to your insight and understanding, research effort, and/or writing and organization. D-- "minimal level of achievement required to receive course credit" --grades in this range indicate work whose problems in insight and understanding, research effort, and/or writing and organization are more glaring than in the case of "C" grades and/or whose redeeming qualities are less notable. F-- "unacceptable level of achievement"-- grades in this range indicate work which fails to meet the minimum level of achievement and/or effort expected at the college level. |
|
|
|
|
|
Return to PS 170 Home |
Bova Home |