|
|
2008-09 Student Teachers |
Fall 2008 Student Teachers

Christine Altieri
(English)
|

Ronald Garbutt
(Mathematics)
|
Brandy Spielman
(English)
|
Spring 2009 Student Teachers
|
Tania Berkowitz
(Spanish) |
Julia Chandler
(Spanish)
|
Benjamin Hargrave
(Spanish) |
Yurina Shim
(Chemistry) |
|
|
The chart below represents the cumulative reaction of teachers who have hosted our students during student teaching from fall 2002 to spring 2007. We are grateful for the fine mentoring provided by the host teachers and their school districts (Carlisle, Cumberland Valley, South Middleton, Big Spring, and Mechanicsburg are the primary districts that host our student teachers) The teachers responding to the survey are veterans and represent some of the finest teachers in their respective school districts. We have included a detailed copy of the survey itself. The feedback provided by the teachers has been of help to us as we have strived to provide an excellent quality of teacher preparation.
Survey Analysis May 2007
Ratings |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Below average |
Poor |
N.O. |
Behavior Management |
11 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CR Management |
17 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Content |
25 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Planning skills |
25 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sp. Needs students |
9 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Parental Comm. |
19 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Varied Instructional Techniques |
23 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Engage Students in Learning Process |
25 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Teacher Centered Processes |
24 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Openness to Criticism |
25 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reflective |
24 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Use of Technology |
23 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Relationship with students |
23 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Relationship with staff |
24 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Formal & Informal Assessment |
23 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
K-12 Standards |
17 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Questioning Strategies |
19 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Over-all Prep of Dickinson students |
25 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cummulative # of selections |
381 (81.8%) |
74 (15.9%) |
8 (1.7%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
3 (.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparisons |
Much Better |
Little Better |
The Same |
Little Worse |
Much worse |
N.O. |
Comparison to other Liberal Arts colleges |
8 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Comparison to all colleges |
9 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
Cummulative # of selections |
17 (43%) |
14 (35%) |
9 (22%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mission Statement
|
|